Data centers & the grid — a playbook for officials

One solution to two problems.

Electricity demand is exploding and household bills are climbing — and the same fix answers both. Home solar and storage, networked into virtual power plants, paid for by the data center companies driving the demand.

+42%
Bills since 2020
Electricity bills jumped roughly 13% in the last year alone — outpacing inflation. 3,4
40×
Data center size
Historical load ran 25–30 MW. Planned 2026 sites demand 100–1,000 MW each. 1,2
½ of U.S.
Blackout risk · 10 yrs
NERC warns more than half the country could face rolling blackouts from short generation. 6
20
Canceled · Q1 2026
A record number of data centers were withdrawn in a single quarter amid local backlash. 8
5M+
Rooftop installs
Since 2022, new rooftop solar capacity has exceeded five nuclear plants per year. 9

The problem

An electricity problem meets a backlash problem.

Demand is exploding while bills accelerate — and communities are pushing back against the data centers driving both.

The electricity problem

The grid can't keep up.

  • By 2030, the U.S. is set to consume more electricity for data centers than for producing aluminum, steel, cement, chemicals, and every other energy-intensive good combined. 5
  • National electricity demand is projected to rise 25% by 2030, per ICF. 4a
  • Utilities plan to spend $1.1 trillion over five years on transmission and distribution — costs that flow straight to bills. 5a
  • The DOE has already granted grid operator PJM authority to curtail data center demand to head off blackouts. 7
The backlash problem

Communities are saying no.

  • Concerns over land use, electricity bills, noise pollution, and water use have driven a wave of local opposition across 2025–26.
  • In Mississippi, xAI ran nearly 50 unregulated gas turbines at a single data center through a permitting loophole. 1b
  • Moratoriums are appearing at the local, state, and federal level as residents organize and petition.
  • Even Microsoft now says it will cover full power costs and stop seeking local tax breaks. 8a

The American rebellion against AI is gaining steam.Wall Street Journal — Tech / Artificial Intelligence 8

Aerial view of the NSA's Utah Data Center — identical buildings sprawling across the landscape
The real thing: a single hyperscale campus can blanket the landscape — and the next one will demand even more power.NSA Utah Data Center · Photo: Electronic Frontier Foundation (CC0, public domain)

The fix

Enter virtual power plants.

People need tools to manage their bills, and the grid needs generation online fast. Networks of small rooftop installations, coordinated by software, do both — and far faster than anything else on the table.

Basic VPP
Solar + battery network
6–12 mo
Utility battery
Front-of-meter storage
27–50 mo
Gas peaker plant
New construction
30–60 mo

Months to add 20 MW of dispatchable peaking capacity — a VPP gets there roughly 6× faster.

A coal-fired power plant
The slow, costly alternative: new fossil generation takes years to permit and build — while ratepayers foot the bill.Coal-fired power plant · Photo: U.S. Geological Survey (public domain)

In action

Examples: VPP's are already delivering.

Size, speed, and scale — drawn from operating programs whose returns and dispatch performance are already on the public record.

California
Demand Side Grid Support
1,000 MW
200k batteries · <3 yrs
Roughly San Francisco's summer-day load. Brattle finds up to 2:1 ROI and up to $200M in ratepayer savings. 10,11
Massachusetts
ConnectedSolutions
2.7×
Return · 2025
$19M invested delivered $51M in direct ratepayer benefits, paying ~$275/kW to residential batteries. 12
Connecticut
Energy Storage Solutions
$2 : $1
Savings per dollar
~$400 upfront plus ~$1,200/yr for 10 years to homeowners. Scored RIM 2.0 by PURA. 13
Illinois
Clean & Reliable Grid Affordability Act
Jun '26
Dispatch live
Gov. Pritzker signed CRGA, creating a scheduled-dispatch VPP, with a fuller program by 2028. 15
Puerto Rico
CBES Program
48 MW
Dispatched · Jul '25
LUMA dispatched 80,000+ home batteries in a single 4-hour event — residential VPPs at utility scale. 14
Texas
Aggregated DER Pilot (ADER)
160 MW
Phase 3 cap · 2025
The PUCT's ADER pilot lets aggregated home solar and batteries serve the ERCOT market — easing strain on long-distance transmission. Scaled up, it can avoid billions in new transmission lines and lower delivery costs for everyone. 20

Momentum

States are leading.

Legislatures are already writing the rule that data center load must be offset with distributed solar, storage, and demand flexibility — paid for by the developer. The language exists. It can be borrowed.

Enacted
Virginia
SB 371 / HB 284

Directs Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power to petition the State Corporation Commission by Jan. 15, 2027 to approve voluntary demand flexibility programs for high-energy-demand customers. Cooperatives serving those customers must stand up their own program by Jan. 1, 2029.

The Commission must consider all forms of demand flexibility — the opening that lets distributed resources compete.

Passed both chambers
New York
S 10642

The Responsible Data Center Development Act. Enacts a 12-month moratorium and requires data centers over 20 MW — new or expanding — to fund host community benefits, with dollar amounts set by the PSC and the community together.

Eligible residential technologies include distributed solar PV and behind-the-meter battery storage, plus heat pumps and heat pump water heaters.

Proposed
Illinois
SB 4016 / HB 5513

Comprehensive environmental, water, and energy standards for hyperscale data centers: cumulative impact assessments, community benefits agreements, a ban on nondisclosure agreements, and a public benefits fund financed by annual fees based on peak demand.

A hyperscale center must bring clean capacity equal to its maximum demand — explicitly including virtual power plants, storage, and demand response — or face mandatory load flexibility.

Public opinion

The public has turned.

Across every recent national poll, Americans increasingly don't want data centers near them — and the number-one reason is what they do to electricity bills.

POLITICO · Public First
16%
say data centers benefit their area

Belief that data centers raise electricity bills jumped from 43% to nearly 60% of Americans in just six months. Only about one in six think the facilities benefit the place they're built.

A 49% plurality would back a candidate who proposes a data center moratorium — versus just 28% for one offering the industry tax breaks.

Morning Consult
71%
want stronger limits on construction

In a national survey of more than 2,200 registered voters, seven in ten said data centers need stronger rules or limits on where and how they're built.

77% are alarmed by deals cut with no public input — the transparency gap that keeps igniting local backlash.

Heatmap Pro · Embold
52%
would oppose a data center near them

Just 28% would support one — a swing of roughly 26 points against data centers since fall 2025. Among Americans under 35, 80% are opposed.

Data centers now rank below every other energy source — solar, wind, gas, nuclear, geothermal — for local support.

But the public isn't against the power — it's against the cost. 74% of voters — including 63% of conservative Republicans — support requiring new data centers to offset their electricity use with rooftop solar and efficiency upgrades on local homes.Rewiring America / Public opinion research · June 2026

DATA CENTER COMPANIES MUST INVEST IN HOME ENERGY SOLUTIONS!

Data center companies are worth trillions. Before the next project breaks ground, tell your representatives: Make developers fund home solar and battery storage — not stick the bill on your community.

The grid needs more electrons. People need bill relief. One rooftop delivers both.The Alliance for Solar Choice

Scroll to Top